|
|
 |
Other Articles:
|
By their own description, which they placed in the 1995 “Yearbook
of American & Canadian Churches,” published by the National Council
of Churches of Christ: “This body was established
in 1960 to achieve cooperation among the various Eastern Orthodox
Churches in the United States. The Conference is a voluntary
association of the Bishops in the Americas established to serve as
an agency to centralize and coordinate the mission of the Church. It
acts as a clearinghouse to focus the efforts of the Church on common
concerns and to avoid duplication and overlapping of services and
agencies.”
According to their own words placed in the Orthodox Christian
community recognized 1994 Directory of Orthodox Parishes and
Institutions in North America: “SCOBA is a Federation of Eastern
Orthodox hierarchs who recognize one another’s canonical status.”
Therefore, admission to membership is strictly up to those who
already make up its membership, influenced by old grievances,
jealousies, personalities, politics, nationalities, covetous, power,
etc. - NOT based on true "canonicity" and the Faith.
SCOBA's membership consists of 10 professing Orthodox Church
entities, of which at least 3 owe their existence to and are under
the 'protection' of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, with
at least two whose supposed "canonicity" is expressly unrecognized
by world Orthodox as schismatics. Today's Orthodox Church in
America-OCA also owes its existence mostly to the Greek Archdiocese.
The permanent presidency of this exclusive organization is whichever
presiding Metropolitan may be of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of
North America.
SCOBA and its self-choosing members have no authority whatsoever
granted them from Holy Canon, Holy Tradition, or their Patriarchates
other than the authority and governance over their own individual
and specific jurisdictions in North America as each's individual
bishops. Although they do not admit until pressed to do so, SCOBA is
not an ecclesiastical overseeing authority nor possessor of any
canonical privilege to make any rulings, determinations, or
judgments all-inclusive of Orthodoxy in North America or regarding
any non-SCOBA Orthodox entities. They are not North America‘s Synod
of Bishops, which does not exist. To put an end to such bold
assumptions on their part, SCOBA members gathered from 30
November-01 December 1994 and issued the statement: “in convening
this present Conference of Bishops, we find ourselves to be an
Episcopal Assembly, a precursor to a General Synod of Bishops.” They
further uncanonically resolved to convene annually “to enhance the
movement toward administrative ecclesial unity in North America,”
exclusive of course of non-SCOBA entities. Reaction to this was
swiftly met with terse rejection from the Greek Ecumenical and other
Patriarchates as a bid to schism from their Mother Churches'
authority and oversight. As a result, the canonical message from
their patriarchates was and is that SCOBA is not an Episcopal
Assembly, Bishops Synod, nor possessor of any all-inclusive
ecclesiastical administrative authority or powers over North
American Orthodoxy.
“The Orthodox Church is a family of sister churches,
decentralized in structure” (The Orthodox Church, 1963, Greek Bishop
Kallistos Timothy Ware).
“It is curious to note how in this complex system the most
unequal bodies, the colossal Russian Church and the one Monastery on
Mt. Sinai, for instance, are arranged side by side as equal branches
and sister churches. …Canonically he [the Ecumenical Patriarch of
Constantinople] has no jurisdiction outside his own Patriarchate.
…the Patriarch of Constantinople has primacy of honor but no
jurisdiction, except in his own Patriarchate” (The Eastern Orthodox
Church , 1911, Fortescue, p. 273, 283, 337).
Just as the Ecumenical Patriarch is not primate, ruler over the
whole Orthodox Church, neither is SCOBA or the Greek Metropolitan in
America over all North American Orthodox.
SCOBA’s first embryonic formation began in 1956, when the then
schismatic and ambitious Russian Metropolia/Russian Orthodox Greek
Catholic Church in America, in cooperation with the National Council
of Churches, organized a series of annual religious education
conferences. This evolved into the creation of SCOBA - the “Standing
Conference of Orthodox Bishops in America.” Not all professed
Orthodox entities in North America participated in the conferences
or the creation of SCOBA, either by choice or from not being
invited. This was due to years of prejudice, mistrust, ethnic
conflicts, ambition, pride and jealousies which flamed between the
uncanonical multiple Orthodox jurisdiction in North America. Just
because some years later they added the term “Canonical” into their
self-created association’s name, does not mean that bishops and
churches who are not a member of SCOBA, whether by choice or
exclusionism, are un-canonical or invalid. Today, elitist SCOBA
members do little to correct this widespread presumption believed
and promoted by less-informed Orthodox Christians as well as
non-Orthodox. For instance, the Russian Orthodox Church Bishop of
Patriarchal Parishes of Moscow in the USA is not a member of SCOBA.
Does this therefore make him and the Russian Orthodox Church’s
parishes un-canonical, invalid? Others were once members of SCOBA
and its predecessor association but chose to resign of their free
will or were simply un-invited to join SCOBA when it began. Does
this make them un-canonical, invalid? SCOBA members call themselves
canonical, and non-SCOBA churches call themselves canonical. One
group “recognizes” the canonicity of each other and rejects
non-members, just as other groups “recognize” each other but not
others. Pure jealousy, pride, and scandal of the devil.
Only in the 20th century has being a “canonical” church or cleric
come to mean an external membership or association whereas,
historically and traditionally, being canonical meant unity in the
Orthodox Faith of Christ "once for all delivered to the saints" (St.
Jude 3).
What has happened in the world of Orthodoxy today is that the
organization and external membership have taken over and now wrongly
define what the Church is or is not. One is reckoned to be “in the
Church,” canonical, or even "valid," if he is affiliated with an
“officially recognized” organization. When people today think of the
Church, they think in Western terms of a physical organization,
association, diocese or jurisdiction and the membership of the local
church in that organization is equated with holding the Faith of
Jesus Christ, whether it actually does or does not. Again, up until
the 20th century, determining who was a canonically valid church or
person was their adherence, their unity with the One Orthodox Faith.
“Many people may be members of the Church who are not visibly so;
invisible bonds may exist despite outward separation. The Spirit of
God blows where it will, and, as Irenaeus said, where the Spirit is,
there is the Church. We know where the Church is but we cannot be
sure where it is not; and so we must refrain from passing judgment…”
(The Orthodox Church, 1963, Greek Bishop Kallistos Timothy Ware).
The Western perception of the Church as membership in
“officialdom” stands in sharp contrast to the teachings of Holy
Scriptures, the Canons, and the holy Fathers, including St Gregory
Palamas who wrote:
“They that are of the Church of Christ are they that are of the
truth; and they that are not of the truth are not of the Church of
Christ… for we are reminded that we are to distinguish Christianity
not by persons who have ecclesiastical titles, but the truth and by
the exactness of the Faith.”
Russian Archbishop Aftimios Ofiesh, founder of the canonical
American Orthodox Catholic Church in 1927, wrote during the height
of the shameful Orthodox ethnic and supremacy wars: "The prime
necessity for Orthodoxy in America at large is to bury the causes of
her divisions and set forth anew on a road of peaceful and united
progress for the good of Holy Church and the Kingdom of Christ.
Orthodox Catholic bishops and leaders should come together in the
spirit of love and the humility of their Master, and sacrifice
themselves and their personal ambitions to the cause of their Church
and their God."
This article is also available online, with a host of other
Orthodox articles, by
clicking here. |